CÁC CÔNG THỨC ƯỚC ĐOÁN ĐỘ LỌC CẦU THẬN DỰA VÀO CYSTATIN C HUYẾT THANH TRONG ĐÁNH GIÁ CHỨC NĂNG THẬN GHÉP

Abstract

Background: Assessing ac ads : kidney transplant FEEfeits lạ ve curate estimation of Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) i ery ‘Mportant. Objective ; W ; ở pn Serum aystatin © {SecWsG]' giang OF combi 2m 18 compared equations Hay formulas based on Scr-based alone to estimate ieee ee eel creatinine ‘Coors be in kidney transplant recipients. Subjects and meth - peta | and simply as p asin’ with stable kidney function were included i Ods: 186 kidney transplant recipients estimated by 2 creatinine-based equations (th Our Study. The patients’ GFRs were (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Ebidomrane. Modification Of diet in renal disease 2009), 7 creatinine-cystatin C based equation fae Collaboration (CKD-EP! creatinine 7 cystatin C-based equations (Arnai Dade, Filta KD-EP} Creatinine-cystatin C 2012) and Feat Ce EUS 2012) Rosuitis, tay PARE, Hoa, Grubb, Le Bricon, Rule. years. CKD-EP} Creatinine-cystatin C 2012 mean age of the subjects was 42.95+11.2 biased (AmGFR: 0.6413 2. and Hoek j st ; * 0134144 : S4uafOns appeared the lea | correlation with mGER (r1 = 0.734 A So Mt Taine respectivel dê: ad ene Ị : 94, 12 =073 ! y) and ha 2012 had the highest Sensitivity ang “6, (P<0.001)) CKD-Ep; BI - | <60mL/mín/1. 73m2 ÊGHielugitome We nelcity 84,8% ang 87.4% Creafinine-cy: GFR combined with Scr were be “We found that o ait 36 lo diagnose m | ir Riper trenecte ie cuang than formulas baseg ee based on ScysC a